|
|
|
Home >
Best of Golf >
Features >
Ideal Finishing Hole
|
|
© Brian D. Morgan
|
By
Geoff Shackelford
Like those useless exams in school that merely assess your ability to memorize
loads of information, purely physical shotmaking tests often leave strategy and
fun out of the process. The mind is only asked to deal with the pressure of
executing difficult shots already mapped out by the architect. Cognitive powers
need not apply. An ideal course should test one’s thinking throughout, but
never more so than at the conclusion of the round, often with the outcome of the
match in the balance. On the final hole, the ability to think clearly and make
good decisions under pressure should be tested as much as any other attribute.
Room must be left open for heroic and imaginative play, allowing for the type of
wild swings that define the most exciting finishes to matches and majors. For
reasons unknown, the lengthy, taxing two-shotter has become synonymous with
a round’s conclusion, especially at most modern layouts, even when short par 4s
and reachable par 5s create far more compelling finishes for a greater array
of players. So our ideal finish is not a long par 4; but it is well
bunkered. It finishes close to the clubhouse so an audience can assemble to
witness the occasional tight match or to enjoy the sight of golfers savoring the
final moments of their round. The conclusion of the round is far more pleasing
to spectate, as well as take part in, than the scene of tortured, tense souls
preparing to tee off—another reason our concluding hole sits closer to the
clubhouse than the first tee does. Finishing close to the clubhouse sometimes
means out of bounds might be in play, which is fine as long as it isn’t so
contrived that it discourages bold shotmaking. Our concluding hole should be
defined by one key design trait. Perhaps it’s a deep swale that swallows balls
like quicksand, yet somehow still allows for the occasional recovery so
remarkable that a glimmer of hope remains. Dramatic for all is a second shot
with a short iron to a small, tightly bunkered green. Two such ideal
finishers come to mind: the devilish 347-yard 18th at Olympic and the
unforgettable 354-yard finish to Donald Ross’ Inverness Club design (pictured). Both play
out in front of the clubhouse and feature steeply sloped putting surfaces where
both major championships and thousands of friendly wagers have been
settled. Inverness’ 18th gets the edge because of a wicked right fringe area
that defies gravity and awaits unsuspecting shots. It is also a bit closer to
the clubhouse. At Inverness, whether it is Bob Tway holing out from a
greenside bunker in the last round to beat Greg Norman in the 1986 PGA
Championship, George Von Elm twice making birdie to force a pair of 36-hole
playoffs against eventual winner Billy Burke in the 1931 U.S. Open, or members
reveling in the evening sun while watching their fellow golfers wrapping up a
tightly contested four-ball match, there is nothing more we could ask of a
finishing hole.Next: Ideal Grillroom
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Columns:
Open to the Public
|
By
Ernie Els
The two-time U.S. Open winner applauds the USGA’s recent decisions to play the national championship on municipal courses
read more » |
Columns:
Head, Heart, Hands, Health
|
By
George Peper
To understand why Tiger Woods is the greatest golfer ever, it doesn’t take much more than looking at the foundations of a long-running youth organization
read more » |
|
|
|
|
home |
site map |
subscribe to LINKS Magazine |
subscription changes |
feedback |
contact us |
advertising information |
order back issues |
get FREE information |
links e-newsletter registration |
links partners |
privacy policy |
terms and conditions
|